Prediction of a novel RNA binding domain in crocodilepox Zimbabwe Gene 157
© Little et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 18 May 2011
Accepted: 21 November 2011
Published: 21 November 2011
Although the crocodilepox virus (CRV) is currently unclassified, phylogenetic analyses suggest that its closest known relatives are molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV) and the avipox viruses. The CRV genome is approximately 190 kb and contains a large number of unique genes in addition to the set of conserved Chordopoxvirus genes found in all such viruses. Upon sequencing the viral genome, others noted that this virus was also unusual because of the lack of a series of common immuno-suppressive genes. However, the genome contains multiple genes of unknown function that are likely to function in reducing the anti-viral response of the host.
By using sensitive database searches for similarity, we observed that gene 157 of CRV-strain Zimbabwe (CRV-ZWE) encodes a protein with a domain that is predicted to bind dsRNA. Domain characterization supported this prediction, therefore, we tested the ability of the Robetta protein structure prediction server to model the amino acid sequence of this protein on a well-characterized RNA binding domain. The model generated by Robetta suggests that CRV-ZWE-157 does indeed contain an RNA binding domain; the model could be overlaid on the template protein structure with high confidence.
We hypothesize that CRV-ZWE-157 encodes a novel poxvirus RNA binding protein and suggest that as a non-core gene it may play a role in host-range determination or function to dampen host anti-viral responses. Potential targets for this CRV protein include the host interferon response and miRNA pathways.
KeywordsCrocodilepox vaccinia poxvirus dsRNA-binding protein HHpred virus interferon Robetta
Crocodilepox virus (CRV) is an unclassified member of the Poxviridae family and its complete genome spans 190,054 base pairs . The genome of this species is approximately 61.1% G+C, similar to the genomes of molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV) and the ORF-like viruses. This relatively high G+C% distinguishes these 3 groups of viruses from other poxviruses; MCV and ORF are in separate genera, and it is likely that CRV will also be placed into a separate genus when officially classified. It is not clear what has driven the genomes of these 3 groups of viruses to become relatively GC-rich while other poxviruses have drifted towards a high A+T content. It is important to note that although an overall A+T% is often used to characterize poxvirus genomes, the individual genes in the viruses vary widely in nucleotide composition; for example CRV and vaccinia virus (VACV) genes range in A+T composition from 24-56% and 54-73%, respectively.
The level of conservation between the ortholog sets from viruses in the various poxvirus genera varies greatly (25-50% aa identity), this reflects varying structural and functional constraints on different proteins. This level of sequence conservation does not hinder identification and inclusion of CRV proteins into poxvirus ortholog sets, but it does create problems when the CRV proteins of unknown function are searched against databases using programs such as BLASTp  since the additional aa changes generated by the pressure to switch to G/C nucleotides reduces the percentage aa identity even though chemically similar aa may have been substituted.
Poxviruses encode numerous proteins that block the host anti-viral response, including proteins that resist the actions of both type I and type II interferons (IFN). These viruses not only encode soluble receptors that block IFN activity (orthologs of VACV-Cop B19, B8) and intracellular inhibitors of IFN activity (orthologs of VACV-Cop H1, E3, K3, and C7) but also interfere with host IFN signalling [3, 4]. VACV-Cop E3 is a dsRNA binding protein that blocks the action of the IFN-inducible dsRNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR). E3 binds both dsRNA and PKR to inhibit its activity as well as inhibiting other host molecules that are part of IFN signalling .
CRV is interesting because of its diversity from other poxviruses, but it also creates significant problems for crocodile farming around the world. Therefore, identifying gene function is of interest in trying to understand how this virus controls host anti-viral responses and for potential vaccine design. Such work can also lead to a better understanding of the reptilian immune system. Therefore we have used a variety of bioinformatics tools to try to predict the function of the many CRV proteins for which the function is currently unknown.
Results and Discussion
Similarity searches for remote homologs of CPV unknown proteins
65 CPV proteins annotated as unknown function in the Viral Orthologous Clusters database (VOCs)  were searched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant protein database using position-specific iterated-BLAST (PSI-BLAST). The only significant hits returned by these searches were self-matches to CRV proteins or matches to other poxvirus orthologs. This was somewhat surprising because of the recent explosive growth in genome sequencing, but may reflect the paucity of sequencing of reptilian or related genomes.
Next, these protein sequences were processed using the remote homology detection server HHPred [6, 7] through the PDBalert interface , which is a more sensitive tool that uses 2° structure information and makes profile-to-profile searches against structural databases. Only 5 of the unknown CRV proteins generated significant (probability ≥80%, e-value ≤ 0.05) hits in the PDBalert  scoring system. For 2 proteins (CRV-ZWE-016 and CRV-ZWE-028) the matches were due to amino acid repeats in the protein sequences. These repeats did not match other protein repeats, but they generated areas rich in a few amino acids and these triggered matches to other proteins with regions in those particular amino acids. One match (CRV-ZWE-076), to the family of flap endonucleases (VACV strain Copenhagen is G5R), had been discovered previously by using PDBalert  (but had not been included in the genome GenBank file which is used to populate the VOCs database), as had the similarity between CRV-ZWE-078 and the NLPC/P60 superfamily of proteins . The final significant match, and the focus of this paper, from the PDBalert searches was between CRV-ZWE-157 and a series of proteins containing dsRNA binding domains (DRBP).
Characterization and Comparative Analysis of CRV-157 and dsRNA binding domains
Prediction of protein function from low similarity alignments, within the so-called twilight zone (<20% identity), is difficult and is best approached by gathering multiple lines of evidence that can build to form a solid conclusion. As determined above using PSI-BLAST, it appears that CRV-ZWE-157 is unique in the known poxviruses and is not an ortholog of the poxvirus PKR inhibitor (VACV-Copenhagen-E3L) that also contains a dsRNA-binding domain. The E3L ortholog of ORF virus, which also possesses a very GC-rich genome, is more than 22% identical to any of the poxvirus orthologs so it is unlikely that CRV-ZWE-157 simply fails to classify with this ortholog family.
When CRV-ZWE-157 was used as input with the PDBalert tool, more than 15 protein hits were matched to a dsRNA-binding domain containing protein, each with a probability score of over 95% and with e-values less than 5.0 × 10-2. The significant feature of this result is that many of these proteins were distinct with relatively low identity scores showing that critical, well-conserved, amino acids within these dsRNA binding domains were responsible for the significant scores. Following this discovery, we revisited the PSI-BLAST search results and noted that although the E-values for the top two hits were very poor (>0.85), they were both proteins that contained dsRNA-binding domains (data not shown).
The CRV-ZWE-157 primary sequence was also analysed with InterProScan, which searches a protein against a variety of databases containing confirmed and predicted protein motifs/domains. Only the Gene3D and Superfamily tools were able detect a dsRNA binding-like domain in the early region of CRV-157. Ribonuclease III , ATP-dependent RNA helicase A , Interferon-inducible dsRNA-dependent protein kinase activator A , and Maternal effect protein staufen  all contain comparable dsRNA-binding domains.
To further assess the prediction that CRV-ZWE-157 contains a dsRNA-binding domain, we used BindN+ , a tool that predicts nucleic acid binding regions from primary protein sequences. This algorithm also indicated that the N-terminal region of CRV-ZWE-157 could bind RNA and calculated that the sites with the highest RNA binding affinities were located 1) at the end of the third β strand/start of the second α-helix and 2) and the end of the first α-helix. This is in agreement with the later modeling experiment (see below).
The secondary structure of almost all dsRNA-binding domains consists of two α helices that lie on a three-stranded anti-parallel beta sheet to produce a characteristic α-β-β-β-α fold . Jpred  predicted this exact pattern in the N-terminus of CRV-ZWE-157 with minor variations in the lengths of the secondary structure units (data not shown).
Structure Modeling of CRV-157
The secondary structure of dsRNA-binding domains can be divided into three motifs . The first motif is an α helix, the second motif consists of the three β strands and the last is another α-helix. As shown in Figure 1 (bottom panel) the secondary structure of the CRV-ZWE-157 model agrees very well with the actual secondary structure of known DRBP structures. Several structures of DRBPs bound with RNA have been solved; the first and second domains display a relatively neutral charge and interact with the dsRNA minor groove, while the third domain has a net positive charge that supports interactions with phosphate backbone of the major groove (Figure 3). Substitutions with arginine in this second α helix maintain strong binding to the major groove . Generally, the first α-helix and the β sheet are less well conserved and are thought to act primarily as a scaffold for the second helix by binding to the RNA minor groove . The DRBPs do not bind RNA through specific nucleotide sequences. This is thought to be due to the fact that the interactions with the minor grooves are water-mediated and allow greater flexibility .
Genomic localization and Possible Origins of CRV-ZWE-157
As discussed above, the CRV-ZWE-157 protein is not an ortholog of the VACV-Copenhagen E3L RNA-binding protein. The CRV gene is located approximately 25 kb from the right end of the genome in a region mostly populated by hypothetical genes of unknown function that are unique to CRV. Thus, there is little information to be gleaned from the location of this gene to indicate a possible origin. However, it is interesting that the CRV-ZWE-157 gene contains only 51.3% G+C, which is relatively low for the CRV genome, whereas the set of 80 core chordopoxvirus CRV genes have a G+C range of 52-76% with a mean of 64% and the non-core CRV genes have a G+C range of 45-73% and a mean of 59%. Thus, this gene and flanking regions appear to be distinct from the bulk of the genome and the comparatively low G+C content of CRV-157 offers support for its acquisition from the host. There are also numerous such regions scattered throughout the genome that may represent areas that have been acquired via horizontal transfer of DNA, most probably from a host .
This bioinformatics study has gathered several lines of evidence to support the hypothesis that the CRV-ZWE-157 protein contains an N-terminal dsRNA-binding motif. HHpred searches matched a number of DRBPs to the CRV protein and Jpred predicted an α-β-β-β-α fold that is standard in all DRBPs. Perhaps the most conclusive evidence is the fact that Robetta successfully modeled the CRV-ZWE-157 amino acid sequence onto the structure of known DRBPs placing the few highly conserved amino acids in the correct location for interactions with dsRNA. The data supports the hypothesis that the CRV-ZWE-157 is unique in poxviruses and that this gene has been acquired from a CRV host since the virus evolved from the last known common ancestral virus.
DsRNA-binding domains are not sequence specific and are often present in association with a variety of other functioning protein domains including those involved in mRNA localization , inhibition of interferon activity , Z-DNA binding as part of virus pathogenesis , and providing platforms for multi-protein complex assembly through WW domains [37, 38]. Unfortunately, analysis of the C-terminal half of CRV-ZWE-157 gave no clue as to the possible function of this domain. However, given that this protein is unique among the poxviruses, it is clearly not one of the "essential poxvirus genes". Two possible scenarios are that it functions in a unique host-range capacity or as a novel virulence factor. For the latter, the dsRNA-binding domain suggests possible functions that include the blocking of interferon function, well known in poxviruses, or a role in the processing of miRNAs.
All poxvirus genome, gene and protein sequences were obtained from the VOCs database ; other protein sequences were downloaded from the NCBI databases. Protein crystal structures models were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and referenced by its PDB ID in parentheses. Searches for remote homologs were initially conducted with PSI-BLAST  with subsequent searches using HHPred [6, 7] via the PDBalert interface . InterProScan  with its associated domain analysis tools was run at the European Bioinformatics Institute web site. Multiple sequence alignments (MSA) of protein sequences were generated using MUSCLE , which has been incorporated into the Base-By-Base MSA editor . Complete poxvirus genomes were visualized and analysed using the Viral Genome Organizer (VGO; ) tool at the Viral Bioinformatics Resource Centre (VBRC ).
Prediction of the secondary structure of CRV-ZWE-157 and other DRBPs was performed with the Jpred secondary structure prediction server  and BindN was used to calculate regions that were likely to bind RNA based on amino acid side chain pKa, hydrophobicity, and amino acid molecular mass . The Robetta protein structure prediction server  was used to determine if the amino acid sequence of CRV-157 could be modeled onto the structure of known DRBPs with confirmation using I-TASSER [27, 28]. Protein structures were displayed using Chimera  and JMol . Secondary structure information used in the MSA was extracted from the 3D structures using the Kabsch and Sander algorithm for defining the secondary structure of proteins (ksdssp) module  of Chimera. The electrostatic surface representations of the CRV-ZWE-157 protein structure and the DRBP template were produced by the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS) plugin  in PyMOL 
List of Abbreviations
Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver
Basic local alignment search tool protein
Crocodilepox virus strain Zimbabwe
DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8
double-stranded RNA-binding proteins
Kabsch and Sander algorithm for defining the secondary structure of proteins
Molluscum contagiosum virus
Multiple sequence alignments
multiple sequence comparison by log-expectation
National Center for Biotechnology Information
Position specific iterated-BLAST
Root mean square deviation
TAR RNA Binding Protein
Viral bioinformatics resource center
Viral Orthologous Clusters
This work was funded by a Canadian NSERC Discovery grant. We would like to thank all the University of Victoria Co-op students that have contributed to the http://Virology.ca Bioinformatics Resource.
- Afonso CL, Tulman ER, Delhon G, Lu Z, Viljoen GJ, Wallace DB, Kutish GF, Rock DL: Genome of crocodilepox virus. J Virol. 2006, 80: 4978-4991. 10.1128/JVI.80.10.4978-4991.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215 (3): 403-410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perdiguero B, Esteban M: The interferon system and vaccinia virus evasion mechanisms. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine research. 2009, 29 (9): 581-598. 10.1089/jir.2009.0073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haga IR, Bowie AG: Evasion of innate immunity by vaccinia virus. Parasitology. 2005, 130: S11-S25. 10.1017/S0031182005008127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Upton C, Slack S, Hunter AL, Ehlers A, Roper RL: Poxvirus Orthologous Clusters: toward Defining the Minimum Essential Poxvirus Genome. J Virol. 2003, 77: 7590-7600. 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7590-7600.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Söding J: Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 951-960. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN: The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005, 33: W244-W248. 10.1093/nar/gki408.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal V, Remmert M, Biegert A, Soding J: PDBalert: automatic, recurrent remote homology tracking and protein structure prediction. BMC Structural Biology. 2008, 8: 51-10.1186/1472-6807-8-51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Senkevich TG, Wyatt LS, Weisberg AS, Koonin EV, Moss B: A conserved poxvirus NLPC/P60 superfamily protein contributes to vaccinia virus virulence in mice but not to replication in cell culture. Virology. 2008, 374: 506-514. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.01.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R: InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005, 33: W116-W120. 10.1093/nar/gki442.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium: Genome Sequence of the Nematode C. elegans: A Platform for Investigating Biology. Science. 1998, 282: 2012-2018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee CG, Eki T, Okumura K, da Costa Soares V, Hurwitz J: Molecular analysis of the cDNA and genomic DNA encoding mouse RNA helicase A. Genomics. 1998, 47: 365-371. 10.1006/geno.1997.5139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel RC, Sen GC: PACT, a protein activator of the interferon-induced protein kinase, PKR. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 4379-4390. 10.1093/emboj/17.15.4379.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- St Johnston D, Beuchle D, Nüsslein-Volhard C: staufen, a gene required to localize maternal RNAs in the Drosophila egg. Cell. 1991, 66: 51-63. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90138-O.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004, 32: 1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brodie R, Smith AJ, Roper RL, Tcherepanov V, Upton C: Base-By-Base: Single nucleotide-level analysis of whole viral genome alignments. BMC Bioinformatics. 5: 96-96.
- Ramos A, Grünert S, Adams J, Micklem DR, Proctor MR, Freund S, Bycroft M, St Johnston D, Varani G: RNA recognition by a Staufen double-stranded RNA-binding domain. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 997-1009. 10.1093/emboj/19.5.997.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentine R, Smith GL: Inhibition of the RNA polymerase III-mediated dsDNA-sensing pathway of innate immunity by vaccinia virus protein E3. J Gen Virol. 2010, 91: 2221-2229. 10.1099/vir.0.021998-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Brown SJ: BindN: a web-based tool for efficient prediction of DNA and RNA binding sites in amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: W243-W248. 10.1093/nar/gkl298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryter JM, Schultz SC: Molecular basis of double-stranded RNA-protein interactions: structure of a dsRNA-binding domain complexed with dsRNA. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 7505-7513. 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7505.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ: The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008, 36: W197-W201. 10.1093/nar/gkn238.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D: Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: W526-531. 10.1093/nar/gkh468.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ: Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. 2001, 409: 363-366. 10.1038/35053110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, Norman J, Cooch N, Nishikura K, Shiekhattar R: TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005, 436: 740-744. 10.1038/nature03868.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sohn SY, Bae WJ, Kim JJ, Yeom K-H, Kim VN, Cho Y: Crystal structure of human DGCR8 core. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007, 14: 847-853. 10.1038/nsmb1294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmstrom L, Baker D: Automated prediction of domain boundaries in CASP6 targets using Ginzu and RosettaDOM. Proteins. 2005, 61: 193-200. 10.1002/prot.20737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y: I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc. 2010, 5: 725-738. 10.1038/nprot.2010.5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y: Template-based modelling and free modelling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins. 2007, 69: 108-117. 10.1002/prot.21702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang SW, Chen H-Y, Yang J, Machida S, Chua N-H, Yuan YA: Structure of Arabidopsis HYPONASTIC LEAVES1 and its molecular implications for miRNA processing. Structure. 2010, 18: 594-605. 10.1016/j.str.2010.02.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daviet L, Erard M, Dorin D, Duarte M, Vaquero C, Gatignol A: Analysis of a binding difference between the two dsRNA-binding domains in TRBP reveals the modular function of a KR-helix motif. Eur J Biochem. 2000, 267: 2419-2431. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01256.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stefl R, Oberstrass FC, Hood JL, Jourdan M, Zimmermann M, Skrisovska L, Maris C, Peng L, Hofr C, Emeson RB, Allain FH-T: The solution structure of the ADAR2 dsRBM-RNA complex reveals a sequence-specific readout of the minor groove. Cell. 2010, 143: 225-237. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.026.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tian B, Bevilacqua PC, Diegelman-Parente A, Mathews MB: The double-stranded-RNA-binding motif: interference and much more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 5: 1013-1023. 10.1038/nrm1528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE: UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004, 25: 1605-1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Da Silva M, Upton C: Host-derived pathogenicity islands in poxviruses. Virol J. 2005, 2: 30-30. 10.1186/1743-422X-2-30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nanduri S, Carpick BW, Yang Y, Williams BR, Qin J: Structure of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain of the protein kinase PKR reveals the molecular basis of its dsRNA-mediated activation. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 5458-5465. 10.1093/emboj/17.18.5458.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim Y-G, Muralinath M, Brandt T, Pearcy M, Hauns K, Lowenhaupt K, Jacobs BL, Rich A: A role for Z-DNA binding in vaccinia virus pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 6974-6979. 10.1073/pnas.0431131100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ingham RJ, Colwill K, Howard C, Dettwiler S, Lim CSH, Yu J, Hersi K, Raaijmakers J, Gish G, Mbamalu G, Taylor L, Yeung B, Vassilovski G, Amin M, Chen F, Matskova L, Winberg G, Ernberg I, Linding R, O'Donnell P, Starostine A, Keller W, Metalnikov P, Stark C, Pawson T: WW Domains Provide a Platform for the Assembly of Multiprotein Networks. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 7092-7106. 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7092-7106.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiohama A, Sasaki T, Noda S, Minoshima S, Shimizu N: Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a novel gene DGCR8 located in the DiGeorge syndrome chromosomal region. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2003, 304: 184-190. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00554-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Upton C, Hogg D, Perrin D, Boone M, Harris NL: Viral genome organizer: a system for analyzing complete viral genomes. Virus Research. 2000, 70: 55-64. 10.1016/S0168-1702(00)00210-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center. [http://www.virology.ca]
- Hanson RM: Jmol - a paradigm shift in crystallographic visualization. J Appl Crystallogr. 2010, 43: 1250-1260. 10.1107/S0021889810030256.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabsch W, Sander C: Dictionary of Protein Secondary Structure: Pattern Recognition of Hydrogen-Bonded and geometrical Features. Biopolymers. 1983, 22: 2577-10.1002/bip.360221211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA: Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001, 98: 10037-10041. 10.1073/pnas.181342398.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schrodinger, LLC: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System.
- Schmid G, Haverkamp F, Rechmann J, Schwanitz G, Zerres K, Hansmann M, Kowalewski S: [Non-immunologic hydrops fetalis (NIHF)--case report of double partial trisomy 15q and 17q resulting from familial translocation 15/17 and cytogenetic findings in 50 cases with hydrops fetalis]. Klin Padiatr. 1987, 199: 309-314. 10.1055/s-2008-1026810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He F, Muto Y, Obayashi N, Shirouzu M, Terada T, Kigawa T, Inoue M, Yabui T, Aoki M, Seki E, Matsuda T, Hirota H, Yoshida M, Koboyashi N, Tanaka A, Osanai T, Matsuo Y, Hayashizaki Y, Yokoyama S: Solution structure of dsRNA binding domain in Staufen homolog 2.
- Airenne TT, Kidron H, Nymalm Y, Nylund M, West G, Mattjus P, Salminen TA: Structural evidence for adaptive ligand binding of glycolipid transfer protein. J Mol Biol. 2006, 355: 224-236. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.